Thursday, November 4, 2010

US Supreme Court Expected Political Ad Transparency

T Murphy writes "The Supreme Court, when ruling that corporate and union political donations were allowed under free speech, assumed the source of the donation would be disclosed immediately under current donation laws. Due to loopholes, this has not been the case, eliminating the hoped-for transparency the Supreme Court ruled to be vital to democracy. Justice Kennedy, who sided with the majority on the ruling, has been called naive for his expectation that there would be greater transparency. In the meantime, campaign spending for House candidates alone is expected to reach $1.5 billion."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotPolitics/~3/j3LhFZ1Omik/US-Supreme-Court-Expected-Political-Ad-Transparency

EPA ERIC CANTOR ERIC HOLDER ERIC MASSA

No comments:

Post a Comment